I try to think in terms of systems. How everything connects. How every role relates to every other role. How the whole only functions because each part understands its place within it. And when I first started speaking, I could not yet see the full system I was entering. I could see myself. I could see the audience. I could not yet see everyone else.
That limitation cost me nothing early on, because early on the stakes were low enough that a narrow view of the job was sufficient. I would get invited to represent my employer — a pioneering company operating at the intersection of professional touring and consumer electronics — and I intuitively understood that my first responsibility was to shine the spotlight on the work we were doing. Brand ambassador. Subject matter expert. Industry voice. I knew not to oversell, not to shill, not to use the platform unfairly. I wanted to give attendees an honest and genuinely useful experience. That instinct was correct. But it was still incomplete.
The shift happened gradually, and then all at once.
As I took on more speaking opportunities and expanded the scope of what I was willing to talk about, I started to recognize something that changed everything about how I approached the role. I was not only there to represent my employer or to speak as a voice for the industry. I was there representing the event itself. I was a public face for the show — for the brand the organizers had been building, for the promise they had made to every attendee who registered and every exhibitor who invested. That is a fundamentally different responsibility than delivering a good talk, and recognizing it profoundly altered the way I thought about what I was actually being asked to do.
The piece that made it real — that made it personal rather than abstract — was understanding the human chain underneath the booking.
An event is not a monolithic machine. It is made up of teams of professionals, each one fulfilling a specific role, each one accountable to the people around them. And somewhere in that structure, a specific human being — or a specific team of human beings — looked at the available options, weighed the alternatives, and chose me. They could have chosen anyone. They chose me. That choice was not anonymous. It was attached to someone's professional judgment, someone's credibility, someone's reputation with their own leadership. When they vouched for me, they transferred a portion of that reputation to my performance.
My failure is their failure. That is not a metaphor. That is the actual consequence.
If I show up underprepared, if I miss the room, if I fail to connect with the audience, if I create a mess they have to clean up afterward — the damage does not stop with me. It lands on the person who put their name behind the decision to book me. They are the ones who have to answer for it. They are the ones who carry it into the next planning meeting, the next budget conversation, the next time someone asks how the speaker selection went.
And the inverse is equally true. When I over-deliver, when I make the event better than it would have been without me, when I go out of my way to be useful before and after the talk, when I make the event team's jobs easier rather than harder — I am giving them a win. I am letting them take credit for a good decision. I am adding to their credibility rather than drawing from it.
That is the real job.
The next time you get booked — before you think about the talk, before you think about the opening line or the closing story or the slide that always lands — take a moment to think about the event from the vantage point of the people who chose you. Think about how full their plates are. Think about how many moving pieces they are managing simultaneously. Think about what it would mean for their day, their week, their professional standing, if you walked in and made everything just a little bit easier.
Ask yourself: where are the friction points I can eliminate? Where can I be more responsive, more prepared, more present, more generous with my time and attention? How can I be a genuine partner to this team rather than one more thing they have to manage?
That is the question that separates the speakers who get invited back from the ones who don't. Not the quality of the talk alone — though the talk matters enormously. The quality of the partnership. The depth of the accountability. The willingness to see the full system and to understand your place within it.
You will know it is working when the invitation arrives before you have even thought to follow up. That is what a compounding trust relationship feels like. And it starts the moment you stop asking how to deliver a great talk and start asking how to serve the people who trusted you with their stage.



.jpg)
