Reverse Engineering The Speaker's Operating System Briefing

Everything in this briefing exists because of one talk.

Bob Windel and I have built what we believe is the most important keynote either of us has ever been part of. The talk has a working title — What Executives Can Learn From Entertainers — but that undersells it. What we have actually built is a complete performance psychology operating system, delivered as a rock show, for corporate audiences who have never been given permission to think about their organizations the way a touring production thinks about a show.

Bob brings 10 years on the road — Goo Goo Dolls, Rob Zombie, The Eagles — followed by 12 years at Apple where he built one of the strongest acoustics teams in the company's history by hiring exclusively from the road. I bring 20 years at the intersection of pro audio and consumer electronics, watching how the invisible infrastructure of live performance maps onto every organizational challenge worth solving.

The core argument is simple and devastating: the roadies are the real stars. The artist is the vision — unbridled creativity, raw fuel. The crew is the nuclear reactor that harnesses it. Without the structure, the fuel implodes. Every company has this same dynamic. Your founder had a vision. Your teams are the structure built to deliver it. The question is whether your structure is tight enough to harness the energy or loose enough to let it leak.

Everything we know about Can't Fail Attitude, about Script as Coordination Law, about trust as the only thing that makes a team bulletproof, about the weak link jamming everyone up — all of it came from watching sound engineers solve impossible problems in real time, from watching Bob save shows that had no business being saved, from watching Don Henley's crew operate with the precision of a military operation because the alternative was unthinkable.

The talk is built. The content is real. The production value is conceived — the announcer recruited from the audience, the walkup music, the arena time-lapse, the wireless mics, the reverb. We know what we have.

What we don't yet have is the room.

THE HONEST ASSESSMENT

Speaking is not my core domain. Sales is. Relationship architecture is. Industry intelligence is. I have spoken at trade shows and association events for years, but always as a subject matter expert with a built-in audience — not as an independent speaker finding rooms cold.

This is a new domain acquisition. And I am treating it exactly the way I treat every new domain: by studying the ecosystem before joining it, identifying the actual buyers rather than the obvious gatekeepers, and normalizing vocabulary before making a single public move.

The research I have done on the MICE ecosystem gives me a framework. The $658 billion market. The event management firms. The MPI buyer community controlling $26 billion in decisions. The DMOs. The corporate event director profiles. I now understand who buys speaking engagements, what problems they need solved, and what language they use to describe success.

Is landing this talk in front of the right corporate audiences a longshot from where we stand today? Yes. Honestly, yes. Bob and I are not household names in the events industry. We have no speaker bureau relationships. We have no track record in this specific market.

But we have a methodology. And the methodology says: build the credibility infrastructure before you need it. Normalize the vocabulary before the sales conversation. Make the booking a confirmation event rather than a persuasion event.

That starts with three articles.

THE THREE ARTICLES TO WRITE

Before pitching to MPI or any event management firm, the vocabulary has to be normalized. Event planners need to encounter my thinking in their own publications, in their own language, before they encounter me on a stage.

Three articles need to be written and published. Each will stand alone. Together they will constitute a unified argument — a Speaker's Operating System — that signals to every event planner who reads them that I already think like one of them.

Article One: Who Does a Speaker Actually Serve?

Most speakers think the answer is the audience. It isn't. The answer is the human who went out on a limb and chose you. Their professional reputation is attached to your performance. Your failure is their failure. Your excellence is their excellence.

This framing — personal, accountable, non-anonymous — is the Backstage OS applied to speaking. It is also precisely the language that makes an event planner lean forward. Write this for them first. Speakers second.

Article Two: What Is the True Role of a Keynote Speaker?

Not performer. Ambassador. A tool that helps the event achieve its goals. A public face that reflects on the entire production team that built the event around it. Five specific behaviors that separate the speakers who get invited back from the ones who don't. Availability before and after the talk. Responding within 24 hours. Thanking the AV team publicly. Learning everything about the event, the attendees, the other speakers.

This article needs to make event planners feel seen. They have been burned by speakers who don't operate this way. Write the article that describes the speaker they've always wanted.

Article Three: Your Job Is to Fill Seats

This one tells a story rather than gives advice. The PAMA story. Rather than waiting for the organization to drive attendance, I made it my personal responsibility. I called. I pulled favors. I drove the numbers. The talk overdelivered on every metric. When I told the story afterward, my friend simply winked and reminded me that the job is to fill the seats.

This story does not belong in a speaker training program. It belongs in an event planner's reading stack — because it describes exactly the kind of speaker they spend their careers trying to find and almost never do. Write it as a story, not a framework. Let the lesson land on its own.

THE META LAYER

Here is what makes this briefing unusual — and worth documenting honestly.

The talk we built is about how entertainers use invisible infrastructure, relentless preparation, and shared scripts to deliver experiences that appear effortless. The roadies rehearse to find failure. The production manager maintains alignment so total quality never sinks to the lowest common denominator. The show starts at 8:00 and there is no pushing the deadline.

The process of finding this talk its audience must use exactly those same principles.

The research is the rehearsal. The articles are the vocabulary normalization — the equivalent of seeding a market before a product launch. The MPI positioning is the stage plot, filed in advance so that when the moment comes, everything is already in place.

Justin Timberlake used to cycle through everyone else's monitor feeds during a show — not to hear himself, but to monitor the integrity of the entire performance around him. He wasn't checking on himself. He was protecting the vision.

That is what this briefing is. Not a speaking career being launched. A vision being protected — systematically, invisibly, prospectively — so that when the room is finally ready, we are already in it.

The articles come first. Everything else follows.

‍